The purpose of the author’s research is to evalute the program’s poor rice in Kelurahan Sungai Jang Bukit bestari Subdistrict town Tanjungpinang 2014. Based on research conducted in the backround because poverty still often connect with underdevelopment and failed. In addition poverty is also one of the most serious social problems. In the case the government hope the public can be encourage to be able to penetrate the poverty trap that has been attached to him so as to reduce the number of. One of them is with in the stipulated by the government , namely the distribution of rice to poor program for families. Poor rice is subsidized rice3 assistance program for low income communities and are parcel of the food security program. A program of poverty reduction and sosicial protection in the field of food by the central government in the form of subsidized maihn assistance to low incom households (poor and vulnerable households are poor).
The research method used is qualitative diskriptif. This research was done at the Kelurahan Sungai Jang Bukit Bestari subdistrict town tanjungpinang, because Kelurahan Sungai Jang most receipents according to data after verification in budgets (budget reveneus and shoping areas) according to the department of social and labor. Withdrawal in this sample who used by researchers is the purposive sampling which purposive sampling is part of the non probality sampling. As researchers took samples as many as 41 people of 398 people.
In the study the authors measure the evaluation expressed by Arikunto states that elements in the implementation of the evaluation is dividied into 3 dimensi namely (a) the existence of feedback (b) tranformasion of the program and (c) the results of the output of the program. Conclusions in the general from researcher input dimensions (input) and charge indicator will human resources in the implementation of the poor is improving rice distribution, poor rice program delivery in the program implementation, and delevery within the framework of the implemetation of the responden argues is improving. For dimensions of activities (prosses) and indicators of timeliness, quality, accuracy, and right on target no matter the respondent argues is still not optimal, program (output) with the indicator increases the well being and prosperity of the incidence of poor public confidence towards the progran of goverment respondents say cannot yet say can improve welfare and the community has not yet fully trust the help fro, the government. In this case we recommend than you must have to furher improve supervision in the distribution of good quality rice as well as logging as well at berrer communication and coordinate more in to better oprimize the longer the poor rice assistance program.
Keywords : evaluation, program, rice, poor